And calls to reduce dogs have failed dearly. During the consideration of the budget for the implementation of Stefan Zöllner (village community/DG), others
And calls to reduce dogs have failed dearly. During the consideration of the budget for the implementation of Stefan Zöllner (village community/DG), the second dog must be paid less. The vast majority of the municipal council did not want to go with them.
Turks field – Whoever keeps a dog in Türkenfeld pays 50 euros a year. A second is added, 150 euros is owed – in the eyes of the customs officer, too much, and significantly above the average of neighboring municipalities. There is no reason to demand triple the rate. “This is arbitrary and excessive.” The taxman asked for a reduction of 100 euros.
In terms of animal welfare
a citizen recently complained in the current quarter of an hour about the high tax rates in türkenfeld and the comparison with the numbers called. Kottgeisering, Schöngeising and Grafrath for the first dog 40 euros, for the second 100. Apply the village does not distinguish between the first and second dog at all, but asks for 51.20 euros for each animal.
the publicist claimed that there is a “Trend for the second dog”, that is, in fact, also in terms of animal welfare. For a single person, with a pet will mean an important social component. The professional holder, however, is in the house all day, whatever is better for the dog, “if the PAL is for it.”
said colleague Robert Miller. The tax rate for the first dog you deliberately keep is low (“a pensioner should have his dog cheaply”), but more dogs would be a burden.
the sum should be remembered, they represent an obstacle
Deputy Mayor Emanuel Staffler (CSU), why at that time they got the second dog tax is so high. “€150 should be a barrier for a luxury second dog.” Mayor Pius Keller (CSU) called on councils for a “great debate” to commemorate, which led to the current tax rates.
A few years ago, it shook the mood between dog owners and the rest of the population, partly caused by dirty sidewalks and ill-mannered four-legged friends. At the same time, there was a section of the individual pet owner who demanded that the tax on the dog be abolished altogether, because it was anti-social.
dog toilets improved the situation
The municipality then requested, at a specially convened meeting, a dialogue with dog owners. They were clear on the subject of taxes, the municipalities, on the other hand, in busy footpaths, toilets for dogs. These have improved, so that the unanimous opinion in the Council, the situation is significant.
“I would like to stand by what was decided after much discussion,” Staffler said. With three votes against the tax collector, the application was rejected.
Also interesting: Drama of death shot at a dog: hunter
speaks Updated date: February 2, 2019, 12:03 p.m
Categories: Optical Illusion
Source: newstars.edu.vn