By destroying old tropes, Prey turns a corner for Native Americans in film

Spoil is the latest entry in the inexplicably long-running Predator franchise about an alien who comes to Earth to hunt humans — inexplicable because, aside from the well-received first entry starring Arnold Schwarzenegger back in 1987, the series was neither a critical darling nor a box office hit. Still, six Predator films were made before Spoilincluding two crossover films Alien vs. Predator (about which the less the better).

The franchise has finally achieved another success Spoil, which is a triumph for critics (92 percent on Tomatometer) and the audience. Although not released theatrically, Hulu is reporting it Spoil is his most-watched TV or movie premiere ever — and it’s no mystery why. The film features stunning landscape photography, compelling performances (including a revealing turn by Amber Midthunder), and tense and thrilling action sequences.

But viewers also respond positively to Spoil because it’s a watershed moment for the national team, one that portrays members of the oft-maligned Comanche tribe as heroes. They are not even depicted as “savage Indians” from the past of cinema (Seekers), neither the mystical figure of the Native Americans (Pocahontas), nor the white man’s helper in the story told from his perspective (The Lone Ranger), but the heroes of their own story from the first moment to the last.

To understand how rare it is and what a significant achievement it is Spoil represents – one praised by domestic critics – we must first consider the representation of Native Americans throughout the history of film.

The stereotype of the ‘savage Indian’

Amber Midthunder in PreyAmber Midthunder as Naru in Spoil. Hulu

Native Americans were among the most popular subjects of early American film (1895-1927), although they were sometimes portrayed sympathetically (as in Buster Keaton’s Pale-faced from 1922), rarely escaped stereotypes. White filmmakers often denigrated them in Westerns (one of the most popular genres of early film and later television) as wild barbarians standing in the way of Manifest Destiny and threatening both the “civilized” progress of white men and the “purity” of white women. . Many early films, such as those of film pioneer DW Griffith, also condemned miscegenation, or the interbreeding of Native Americans and whites.

Griffith was hardly alone. John Ford, another of cinema’s most prominent figures whose career spanned much of the 20th century, denigrated Native Americans in popular films such as Stagecoach (1939), Drums with Mohawk (1939), i Rio Grande (1950). He felt bad about it in later years and tried to paint them in a more human light in works like Cheyenne Autumn (1964). But by then, Ford—along with the purveyors of thousands of other Westerns that featured bloodthirsty American Indians whooping, howling, and scalping—had done irreparable damage.

Henry Brandon as Scar in The Searchers Henry Brandon as Scar in Amber Midthunder as Naru in Prey. Warner Bros.

One of Ford’s most infamous films is Seekers (1956), in which Ethan Edwards (John Wayne) hunts down the Comanches and their leader “Scar” after they kill his family, burn down their frontier farm and kidnap his young niece (Natalie Wood). Does Ethan want to save her? No, he wants to slaughter her along with the Comanches who kidnapped her now that her white purity has been “destroyed” by the American Indians.

Despite this, Seekers has long been hailed as one of the greatest American films. One example of her influence is that she inspired George Lucas, who paid homage to her with a scene of a burning estate in Star Wars. Brutal depiction of the Comanche in the Seekers helped turn them into monstrous figures of the popular imagination, though it was hardly the only film to do so. Comanchesanother example from 1956, he also portrayed them as barbarians. (Although both films criticize the actions of white people, they do not go nearly far enough in humanizing the native characters).

In a historic departure, Spoil undermines the racist depiction of the Comanche by portraying them not only as heroes and warriors who respect the land, but as people in all their flawed complexity and conflicting impulses, something American films have rarely done.

The stereotype of the ‘noble savage’

Kevin Costner and Graham Greene in Dances with WolvesEnter Kevin Costner and Graham Greene Dances with Wolves. Orion

Characters in Spoil mostly starring Native American actors, which is rarer than you might think. American films and culture have a long history of using redface — actors who paint their faces and otherwise dress like Native Americans. This is another way in which indigenous peoples were disenfranchised and stereotyped by the dominant culture, since they were often not even allowed to play themselves.

For example, the white actor Henry Brandon played the Comanche antagonist in both Seekers and Comanches. Shockingly, the use of redface (and blackface, yellowface, etc.) is not limited to the past. Every few years a new controversy arises, whether it’s Emma Stone and Scarlett Johansson playing characters of Asian descent in the Aloha (2015) and A ghost in a shell (2017), namely Johnny Depp who plays the Indian Tonto in The Lone Ranger (2013). Spoilin contrast, it features an all-Indian cast for first time everaccording to the film’s director, Dan Trachtenberg (with the exception of Dane DiLiegro, who plays the Predator).

Dakota Beavers in PreyDakota Beavers as Taabe in Spoil. Image used with permission of the copyright holder

The use of redface and cultural appropriation served not only to portray American Indians as savages. It was also used to portray the figure of the noble savage, another common stereotype. These characters are depicted as primitive but gentle, embodying heaven on Earth, freed from the constricting modernity that is the cause of the white man’s unhappiness.

The character of the noble savage began to appear regularly in revisionist westerns and other films of the sixties and seventies, such as Little big man (1970), A man called Horse (1970), and One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest (1975). These films reflected a new progressive sensibility that sought to come to terms with the crimes of America’s past in the context of the Civil Rights Movement and the Vietnam War.

Disney's Pocahontas.jpgDisney’s Pocahontas (1995). Image used with permission of the copyright holder

The noble savages lack a hero of their own kind and often worship and help the white hero, while the Indian women love the white hero and are often ready to die for that love. Examples include the Sioux in the Dances with Wolves (1990), who accept a white man (Kevin Costner) as their leader. Other examples include The Last of the Mohicanswith (1992), Pocahontas (1995), and more recently River of wind (2017).

Although the figure of the noble savage may seem less harmful than the figure of the savage, it is just as dehumanizing as it presents native people as mystical beings whose purpose is to help shepherd the white man’s spiritual journey and forgive him the guilt of his transgressions against them.

How Prey flips the script

Comanche warriors in bootyHulu

Spoil there is neither a savage nor a noble Indian trope. Do any of the Comanche characters behave violently? Of course, it was a difficult time! Also, they fight against warriors from another planet! Do some of them behave nobly? Yes, there are many examples of courage and sacrifice. But these characteristics do not define in stereotypical ways through a white point of view. The characters represent a rich variety of personality types. They behave in contradictory, surprising and disappointing ways, just like everyone else.

In another historic move, Hulu is offering the film in both an English version and a version dubbed into the Comanche language (something that obviously wouldn’t be possible with a theatrical release, although it would be exciting to see this film on the big screen). As with any dubbed film, the fact that the dialogues aren’t quite in sync with the mouth movements is a bit annoying, but it’s still nice to hear the spoken language. It’s also quite a testament to the commitment and cultural respect on Hulu’s part to offer this at all.

Predator and Naru in prey. Hulu

The English version also has problems. Both the dialogue and the inflection with which the actors deliver it sometimes sound like they are spoken by 20 or so characters from the CW show. The film generally feels too contemporary in the way it uses the clichés of action movies and YA fiction, including one where a young woman has to prove herself to all the men who scoff at her desire to become a hunter/warrior.

But even the ability to make a cliché-ridden genre film is a victory for Native Americans. Often when given the opportunity to represent rarely seen groups on screen, filmmakers feel enormous pressure to turn the film into a cultural document that becomes all things to all people. They get bogged down in presentation and the story suffers. They are afraid to make mistakes.

SpoilThe creators don’t feel compelled to be hypocritical or condescending about Native Americans. It just shows us something of Comanche life around 1719 and then continues its work as an action film. Through a character’s actions, rather than through some grand statement, we get to see what amazing people they are. And if the film has a few flaws, hopefully they can brush them off and move on to the next one, just as white filmmakers have been allowed to do for over a century. It’s only when they get funding for multiple chances to create art that artists can mature into something special.

Change of representation?

Kiowa Gordon and Jessica Matten in Dark WindsEnter Kiowa Gordon and Jessica Matten Dark winds. AMC

All this being said, no Spoil indicate a change in the positive representation of Native Americans? It is probably too early to tell based on the success of one film. Many extremes throughout history seem to point to change that either never comes or takes a while to actually appear. For example, Marlee Matlin won the Oscar for best actress in Children of a lesser God didn’t lead to a widespread breakthrough in mainstream portrayals of the deaf community by deaf actors until last year Codewhich won three Oscars including Best Picture.

And the fact that Spoil was made for streaming and not for theaters, suggests that studio executives don’t think a film from the franchise with an all-Native cast would make money at the box office. Still, the signs are encouraging. The popularity of the film indicates that the viewers are not being fair open to new kinds of stories – or at the very least, familiar stories told in a radically new way – but hungry for them.

Several other recent productions may also signal diverse representation. Dogs for reservationsalso on Hulu, is a comedy-drama about contemporary Native teenagers living in Oklahoma from the minds of Sterlin Harjo and Taika Waititi, both Native producers (Harjo is Seminole and Waititi is from New Zealand and of Māori descent). Dark windson AMC, is based on Tony Hillerman’s Navajo cop novels, and is executive produced by Native filmmakers Graham Roland and Chris Eyre, the latter of whom directed one of the few depictions of contemporary Native American life with Smoke signals (1998).

booty | Coming Clip | Hulu

Creative control, more than anything else, is key. Trachtenberg is an excellent director (his 10 Cloverfield Lane is one of my favorites), and he does a great job directing Spoil, but why didn’t an indigenous director make this film? The real power lies behind on camera, in the director’s chair, and especially in offices and boardrooms where executives make decisions about what will be funded and built. When more Native Americans – along with more Americans of all kinds – share this power, then change will happen.

Editor’s recommendations

Categories: GAMING
Source: newstars.edu.vn

Leave a Comment