Molly Gaston Wikipedia, Wiki, Prosecutor, Attorney, Photo, Justice

Molly Gaston Wikipedia, Wiki, Prosecutor, Lawyer, Photo, Justice

Molly Gaston Wikipedia, Wiki, Prosecutor, Lawyer, Photo, Justice – Federal prosecutors sharply rejected former President Donald Trump’s request for an April 2026 trial date on charges related to his alleged attempt to rig the 2016 election on Monday, saying based on the request for false statistics and exaggeration of the amount of evidence in the case.

Molly Gaston Wikipedia, Wiki, Prosecutor, Lawyer, Photo, JusticeMolly Gaston Wikipedia, Wiki, Prosecutor, Lawyer, Photo, Justice

Trump’s request for a trial related to the 2026 election has been denied by a special prosecutor.

According to Molly Gaston, senior assistant special counsel on Jack Smith’s team, Trump’s lawyers misrepresented the fact that conspiracy cases typically took 29.4 months to conclude.

She pointed out that this long period of time also includes the time from trial to sentencing, which often lasts for months. In addition, Gaston noted, the figures cover the period from September 2021 to October 2022, when, at the height of the Covid epidemic, only 22 cases nationwide went to trial.

Gaston’s six-page brief states: “The question here is when it is appropriate to go to trial in this case, and statistics relating to the length of time from indictment to sentencing in other … cases have no bearing on that decision. This small and skewed sample does not assist the court in making a decision about an appropriate trial date.”

The special counsel’s team disputed Trump’s claim that the court in his case, U.S. District Court Tanya Chutkan, granted a significantly longer pretrial stay in cases related to the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol than what the government had requested for Trump. The length of certain cases, according to the prosecutor’s office, was extended by plea bargains and the replacement of indictments, which introduced new levels of complexity.

Molly Gaston Wikipedia, Wiki, Prosecutor, Lawyer, Photo, JusticeMolly Gaston Wikipedia, Wiki, Prosecutor, Lawyer, Photo, Justice

Given the difficulty of trying a former president, Smith proposed that Trump’s trial begin on January 2, 2024. That’s an incredibly short and ambitious timeframe. He argued that a speedy trial would serve the public interest in the case, and took steps to organize the Trump material in a way that should facilitate a trial.

Trump’s lawyers, John Lauro and Todd Blanche, have often pointed to the 11.5 million pages and records the prosecution turned over to Trump earlier this month as justification for the lengthy preparation period for their proposed trial. On Monday, prosecutors said they sent another 600,000 pages to Trump’s team on Saturday.

“[O]the usual order when faced with such massive discovery is to set a reasonable trial schedule commensurate with the size and scope of the discovery and the complexity of the legal issues,” the defense attorneys argued in their letter.

Gaston, however, claimed that this amount was also false. According to her, the initial batch of information contained about 3 million pages and files that Trump already had access to through his campaign and political action committee. An additional million pages were taken from the files of the House investigative committee, which were mostly available to the public. She further said that the hundreds of thousands of pages came from Trump’s White House records, which are kept at the National Archives and which he still has access to as a former president.

Molly Gaston Wikipedia, Wiki, Prosecutor, Lawyer, Photo, JusticeMolly Gaston Wikipedia, Wiki, Prosecutor, Lawyer, Photo, Justice

In addition, Gaston noted, “The government has committed to providing the defense with a series of key, organized documents that the government considers to be some of the most relevant to its case-in-chief.” “The government has provided these materials in ready-to-load files so that the defense can quickly review them in the same way the government did—through targeted keyword searches and electronic sorting,” the government said.

“The defendant’s proposed trial date, however, rests on the erroneous claim that it is necessary for counsel to review discovery page by page in order for the defendant to receive a fair trial,” Gaston added. But Defendant can, should, and allegedly will take advantage of electronic screening to reduce the amount of material that needs to be combed through by hand.

Categories: Biography
Source: newstars.edu.vn

Leave a Comment