TV tip to take you on vacation Two things are on the horizon: warmer weather and new warnings from the government that we need to do better to keep up.
TV tips that take you on vacation
Two things are on the horizon: warmer weather and new warnings from the government that we must do better to maintain social distance. One thing remains: the debate about racism and how best to combat racism, which continues unabated through the spring and summer.
There’s one thing you can do for a more fun visit to these three themes: Take Erna’s advice, stay on the couch, and watch a movie—specifically, Spike Lee’s 1989 classic “Do the Right Thing.”
It is located in a Brooklyn neighborhood where the relationship between different ethnic groups is partly guarded, partly partly and partly friendly. The neighborhood is mostly black, but with other details: Sal (Danny Aiello) has a pizzeria on the corner, a Korean couple has opened a store, and white policemen pass by from time to time and tell citizens what to do.
But then one day, on the hottest day of the year, it explodes and something happens that shouldn’t have happened. He starts small: one of the transfer of young clients complains that there are only photos of Italian stars on the wall, while almost all of his clients are black. There is one case that could have been kept at a low level, but for various reasons was not. And everything gets worse when the police intervene. Spike Lee said that he was inspired by a newspaper article that the number of murders increases when the temperature rises above a certain level. Turn up the heat too high, people will boil.
I saw “Do the Right Thing” earlier in the summer and was almost shocked at how cheesy it was. It is a funny, witty and inventive film, which gradually sharpens renneløkken and effektfullt that it is unthinkable to laugh. The only thing that seems outdated are the happy and angular letters and pictures of the cartoon that exudes the transition between the eighties and the nineties.
everything, everything else goes into exactly what we are talking about now: how prejudices arise and are maintained, and perhaps can be broken. If individuals see each other as an envelope of the community structures with which they live. What creates anger and what creates reconciliation.
The film was controversial in its time. “Do The Right Thing” came out after several cases of police abuse of black Americans and alludes to several of them. Some critics felt that it was irresponsible of Lee to let the film open in the summer.
In a review that is not particularly well received in retrospect, David Denby wrote in New York Magazine that “…if any viewer is angry, they are partly responsible. Lee wants to unsettle people, to ‘wake them up.’ wake them up to do what? (…) I guess Spike Lee doesn’t believe that violence is the solution to anything, but in black communities he will probably be seen as an angry man, a man who, despite his success, is willing to destroy things “.
Spike Lee himself would return to this review, noting that Denby felt that black viewers could not see the film as a movie. But there were some people who found “Do the Right Thing” provocatively ambivalent: who saw the lack of a clear message or direct resolution of communal tensions as an indication that the director himself had a dubious attitude toward the violence he depicted.
Looking back, it’s sad how so many people don’t recognize this as a quality: Lee doesn’t fall into a ditch, he’s more descriptive than self-righteous, he’s empathetic to everyone, and he knows exactly what he’s doing when creating sympathy for characters who will then trample his feet. own limits and those of others. The lack of clear answers is a strength.
Film critic Roger Ebert got it right when he noted that “Do the Right Thing” is more an anger film than an anger film: “Reckless people have accused Lee of being an angry director over the years. There’s a lot to be angry about.” about, but that’s not what I see in his works. The wonder of “Do the Right Thing” is that it’s so fair. Those who enjoyed his movie as an incitement to violence say a lot about him, and nothing appropriate about the movie. There’s a pervasive feeling of sadness here.”
The film was nominated for two Oscars in the same year that “Driving Miss Daisy” won Best Picture, a sentimental motif that seems almost reactionary for dealing with the very themes Lee delved so deeply into. During last year’s Oscars, he lost one of his more recent films, “BlackKklansman,” to “Green Book,” also a fairly light film about racism, in which a white chauffeur drives a black pianist across the South. .
As Lee himself said, “Every time someone leads someone, it means I’m losing.” But in the long run, he’s the one who wins, because his movies will shine long after the competition has been shrouded in the dust of history.
Include user LydErrorAllerede plus? Login to it “PARASITE” mistake: Never before has a foreign-language film won the Oscar for Best Picture. Until now. Video: AP/ABC Show more You can send your article and opinion to Dagbladet here
You want to talk?
Visit the Dagbladet debate! Date updated: August 10, 2020, 04:17
Categories: Optical Illusion
Source: newstars.edu.vn