The controleure of prisons disagrees with the grouping of inmates radicalized. It would be on criteria that are opaque and result in violations of freedoms. “
The controleure of prisons disagrees with the grouping of inmates radicalized. It would be on criteria that are opaque and result in violations of freedoms.
“Standardization” of support, criteria “opaque”, with liberties… In a report made public on Wednesday, the comptroller of prisons Adeline Hazan provides a critical assessment of the management of inmates radicalized, five years after the creation of the first dedicated districts.
This specific had been decided, after the shock of the attacks, the jihadists of January 2015 and suffered from a number of developments, a major turning point having been operated on after the attack with a knife by a young islamist in a unit dedicated to the prevention of radicalisation to’osny (Val d’oise) in September 2016.
READ ALSO >> Prisons : investigation on the difficult management of the radicalized
Your support is essential. Subscribe for $ 1 support Us
Severe with the first groups of inmates radicalized, the general control of places of deprivation of liberty (CGLPL) still thinks it is “unsatisfactory” in their support, in its third report on the topic. “She has changed, but the substance of the criticism remain the same. This is much more a tool of management of the detention as a way to take charge of radicalization,” says the comptroller general Adeline Hazan.
A category to the “contours ” ambiguous”
The first complaint focuses on “the creation of a specific category” under the “contours ” ambiguous”. It concerns a little less than 1500 inmates and includes both people in prison (sentenced or awaiting trial) for terrorism, called “TIS” (islamic terrorists) by the authority, and the ordinary prisoners suspected of radicalization, the “DCSR”.
The integration of the latter into the category of “radicalized” is carried out according to criteria that are “opaque and discriminatory”, and not “give rise to any information of the person concerned,” said CGLPL in its report, based on interviews conducted during visits to the seven institutions and lashings of fifty prisoners.
A regime close to the isolation
All have a vocation to pass through one of the six districts, evaluation of radicalisation (QER), where for four months a multidisciplinary team to measure their risk and their degree of radicalization. Their assessment determines their future assignment, in the normal prison, in solitary confinement or in a neighborhood of the support of the radicalisation (QPR). The criteria are also “often fuzzy,” and without adversarial proceedings, according to the report.
READ ALSO >> “More proselytes and violent”: the inmates are radicalized, a challenge for prisons
The inmates in the specific areas have a “detention regime almost equal to that of the isolation,” still points to the CGLPL. All of them are subjected to conditions of detention “exorbitant”, “justified by security imperatives” but the “systematic questioning of their legality”.
Read our complete file
Radicalization islamist: those French who become jihadists
Revoked in 2018 for proselytizing, a police officer will regain his post, the 150 convicted for terrorism, who will soon be out of jail Attack to the prefecture of police : the track of terrorist is confirmed
The report regrets that “the preparation to the exit (not) not thinking.” “Devoid of development project of punishment and social opportunities and professional support for the ‘radicalization’ proposed appears to be of no effect,” writes the CGLPL.
Date Of Update: 10 June 2020, 06:58
Categories: Optical Illusion
Source: newstars.edu.vn