A digital criminal case must scan the entire court process. Associations are afraid of the violation of personal data. They are afraid of “gay pointing”. Fo
A digital criminal case must scan the entire court process. Associations are afraid of the violation of personal data.
They are afraid of “gay pointing”. On Monday, four LGBT associations filed an abuse of authority complaint before the State Council against a brand new “digital criminal file intended to scan the entire judicial process.”
READ ALSO >> Geolocating anti-LGBT acts: why the application “Zastava!” shares
the digital “criminal case” (DPN), part of the reform of the justice system until March 2019, came into force on June 25 with the publication of an implementing regulation in the official gazette.
Your support is essential. Subscribe for $1 support us
According to the decree, the tool for the dematerialization of the criminal procedure, from the lawsuit to the verdict, is “to make the criminal justice system more efficient through modernization and simplification (…), to make the decisions of judges more effective, to give more meaning to its mission and to restore citizens’ trust in justice”.
“Unnecessary and disproportionate” collection
This new system of computerized processing can enable the recording of various actions, investigations, minutes of meetings, assessments, reports, etc.) and personal data about witnesses, victims or accused (defendants or witnesses) in connection with the case.
ALSO READ >> 25% of LGBT people say they are victims of discrimination in the workplace
This information can be, according to the decree, “of the nature of those mentioned” in Article 6 of the “Computers and Freedoms” law of 1978, which aims at – among other things – “the sexual life or sexual orientation of persons”.
Except for persons suspected of criminal offenses of a sexual nature, it is an “unnecessary and disproportionate” gathering, condemned in the statement of the association, Moss filed a complaint with the associations Stop Homophobia, Family-LGBT and Adheos.
Risk for the protection of personal data
“When they are stored in an online file, these data will be available to many stakeholders, which the regulation does not define precisely,” says Pjena, pointing out the “high risk” that the regulation on personal data protection is expected to carry. .
“Filming the sexual orientation of witnesses and victims is counterproductive. It will deter victims from filing complaints, and witnesses from testifying. This is unacceptable!” says rebel Frédéric Hay, president of the Adheos association.
Date of update: July 7, 2020, 02:58
Categories: Optical Illusion
Source: newstars.edu.vn